California Utility to Install Solar Panels

California Utility to Install Solar Panels

By MATTHEW L. WALD
Published: March 27, 2008

An electric company plans to install a huge patchwork of solar cells, 10 times bigger than any previous such installation, on more than 100 large rooftops around Southern California.

The California governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, will take part when Southern California Edison announces the plan on Thursday. The solar panels, covering more than two square miles of rooftop, will be able to produce 250 megawatts of electricity when the sun is shining, enough to power about 160,000 homes.

Solar photovoltaic installations are usually measured in thousandths of a megawatt, and Edison’s order is roughly equal to all the solar cells produced in the United States last year.

The plan illustrates the shifting finances and growing scale of the solar industry. Once consisting mainly of small projects paid for by the owners of homes or businesses, solar installations are increasingly being financed by companies that offer cheaper electricity or lease payments in exchange for the use of a roof.

Southern California Edison faces strong growth in electricity demand, John E. Bryson, the chairman and chief executive, said in a telephone interview.

Edison is under orders from the state to produce 20 percent of its power from renewable sources by 2010, a goal Mr. Bryson said it was unlikely to meet. Among the challenges is building new transmission lines from areas that are appropriate for windmills or other renewable sources.

In contrast, the solar installations are simple, he said. “We kick this off, and we believe we will even have some on rooftops available to help meet the August summer peak,” he said. Finishing the $875 million project will take about five years, and it requires approval from state regulators.

Mr. Schwarzenegger is scheduled to appear at the announcement Thursday on the roof of a warehouse in an industrial neighborhood near the airport in Ontario, Calif.

He said in a statement, “These are the kinds of big ideas we need to meet California’s long-term energy and climate change goals.” He added that more partnerships between commercial building owners and utilities could “set off a huge wave of renewable energy growth.”

Edison plans to cut costs by putting in relatively large installations, with teams moving from building to building. Advocates hope that the project’s scale will change the basic economics of solar cells, whose power is far more expensive than conventional electricity. Southern California Edison will own the cells and install them on leased space.

The largest solar installation in this country is 14 megawatts, at Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada. The largest in the world, in Spain, is 23 megawatts. Of the top 10 worldwide, all are in Spain or Germany, except for Nellis.

While the installation is huge in solar terms, it is only about half the size of a modest coal-fired power plant, and its energy output over a year will be only about a fourth to a third of what a coal plant of the same size would produce. That is because the solar plant will work only in daylight, and produce maximum power only when the sun is directly overhead and unobstructed by clouds.

Ok, why can’t we do that here in the middle of central Illinois? I know the article says that a solar plant will only work in daylight and produce maximum power on sunny days when the sun is directly overhead, but think about it – that’s still a lot of solar power to replace some coal usage.

I’ve been studying climate change for the past two weeks, as I’m doing papers on climate change for both of my classes. Coal-powered power plants are some of the highest contributers to CO2 emissions in this country, and CO2 is one of the gases that contributes to global warming/climate change. Carbon dioxide stays in the atmosphere for about one hundred years, and the more coal (and petroleum, in cars) we burn, the more CO2 is released into the air. CO2 traps reflected sunlight in our atmosphere and keeps the heat here, causing rising air and surface temperatures. Eventually, the oceans start to heat up as well, which causes ice melt. The more ice that melts, the less ice there is to reflect some of the sunlight, and the more water there is to absorb the heat. Enter vicious cycle of melting ice and rising sea temperatures. And air temperatures. And land temperatures.

This is why we need to start using alternatives to coal and oil, and we need to do it NOW.

Advertisements

About faithenvironmentcollide

Child of God. Follower of Christ. Wife to Jeff. Mom to Liam. Environmental steward. Writer. Reader. Researcher. View all posts by faithenvironmentcollide

One response to “California Utility to Install Solar Panels

  • Jeff

    One reason is that we are farther north than the California installation. Because we are farther north, the Earth’s natural curve means that the sun will always be just a bit lower in the sky, and never gets completely overhead. because of the angle, we receive a lower level of sunlight, meaning that the installation of a solar array in Illinois would be less efficient (in an industry where efficiency determines profitability) than the one in California.In Illinois, wind power is much more likely to be profitable. Chicago would be well served to keep it’s nickname in mind and consider an array of windmills just off the coast in Lake Michigan.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: